<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portland Poverty Awareness March Fri. Oct. 21 11:30AM</title>
	<atom:link href="/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/</link>
	<description>New website changes underway!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Sarnoff</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sarnoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 08:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If we are serious about creating an alternative to the creeping plutocracy that has parlyzed Congress we must do everything in our power to reshape the Supreme Court that enables it and neuter the money talks political structure that the court has put in place.

It would be appropriate for us to establish a pledge from candidates for public office that limits all contributions to those coming from individuals and to an amount affordable to most people - I would suggest the cost of a ticket to a Nascar Race, or of a 16gb Iphone 4s.  the names of those who do not take the pledge should be published and assumed to be the employees of Wall Street and the Koch Brothers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we are serious about creating an alternative to the creeping plutocracy that has parlyzed Congress we must do everything in our power to reshape the Supreme Court that enables it and neuter the money talks political structure that the court has put in place.</p>
<p>It would be appropriate for us to establish a pledge from candidates for public office that limits all contributions to those coming from individuals and to an amount affordable to most people &#8211; I would suggest the cost of a ticket to a Nascar Race, or of a 16gb Iphone 4s.  the names of those who do not take the pledge should be published and assumed to be the employees of Wall Street and the Koch Brothers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzchief</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>mzchief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: comments typed in aren&#039;t getting posted. This is my 3rd attempt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: comments typed in aren&#8217;t getting posted. This is my 3rd attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 01:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d agree that Obama had nothing to do with the crash - but he has had a lot to do with the lack of recovery.  All of the policies he has pursued have been antithetical to a recovery.  Name one policy decision he has made that has improved the economy or lead to improvement.

While Obama didn&#039;t have anything to do with the crash - you are right that Bush contributed to it, but I would suggest that the biggest culprit was congress pushing Fannie and Freddie to loosen their underwriting standards with the goal of increasing homeownership rates.  Yes, they accomplished that goal by agreeing to buy a bunch of loans made to unqualified buyers and turning those loans into Mortgage Backed Securities.  Barney Frank spearheaded this whole push.

It&#039;s time for grown-up leadership in Washington - and that certainly isn&#039;t Obama, and neither was it Bush (but I&#039;d take Bush back in a heartbeat compared to Obama&#039;s cluelessness.  Who would have thought that Obama would have made Carter look competent, Nixon look honest, and Bush look smart?).  You Occupy crowd are being duped and used by Obama.  Think for yourselves - no more sound bites and simplistic slogans.  You certainly DO NOT represent the 99%.  Polling shows that roughly only a third of the population is even somewhat supportive of you.  I&#039;m one of the 67% that think Occupy is clueless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree that Obama had nothing to do with the crash &#8211; but he has had a lot to do with the lack of recovery.  All of the policies he has pursued have been antithetical to a recovery.  Name one policy decision he has made that has improved the economy or lead to improvement.</p>
<p>While Obama didn&#8217;t have anything to do with the crash &#8211; you are right that Bush contributed to it, but I would suggest that the biggest culprit was congress pushing Fannie and Freddie to loosen their underwriting standards with the goal of increasing homeownership rates.  Yes, they accomplished that goal by agreeing to buy a bunch of loans made to unqualified buyers and turning those loans into Mortgage Backed Securities.  Barney Frank spearheaded this whole push.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for grown-up leadership in Washington &#8211; and that certainly isn&#8217;t Obama, and neither was it Bush (but I&#8217;d take Bush back in a heartbeat compared to Obama&#8217;s cluelessness.  Who would have thought that Obama would have made Carter look competent, Nixon look honest, and Bush look smart?).  You Occupy crowd are being duped and used by Obama.  Think for yourselves &#8211; no more sound bites and simplistic slogans.  You certainly DO NOT represent the 99%.  Polling shows that roughly only a third of the population is even somewhat supportive of you.  I&#8217;m one of the 67% that think Occupy is clueless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Majestic</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Majestic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yeh.  And the republicans have our best interests in mind.  My assets and retirement DIED during the last REPUBLICAN administration.  Barrack Obama had nothing to do with it.  Are you serious?  what a joke!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeh.  And the republicans have our best interests in mind.  My assets and retirement DIED during the last REPUBLICAN administration.  Barrack Obama had nothing to do with it.  Are you serious?  what a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STOP BLOCKING TRAFFIC and DESTROYING PUBLIC PROPERTY. You are keeping ME from geeting to my JOB. Your message doesn&#039;t match up with your actions and I&#039;m sick of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOP BLOCKING TRAFFIC and DESTROYING PUBLIC PROPERTY. You are keeping ME from geeting to my JOB. Your message doesn&#8217;t match up with your actions and I&#8217;m sick of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzchief</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-750</link>
		<dc:creator>mzchief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did make a very short response here 2 days ago. Not sure where it went ...

&#039;Late Night FDL: If You Need “Economic Certainty” Before Investing, You’re Not a Risk Taker&#039;
By: dakine01 Wednesday September 21, 2011 8:00 pm
Link: http://firedoglake.com/2011/09/21/late-night-if-you-need-economic-certainty-before-investing-youre-not-a-risk-taker

By definition, business activity involves risk. If it doesn&#039;t, then it&#039;s called &quot;corporate welfare&quot; or &quot;privatizing the benefits to a privileged few while socializing the risks&quot; (i.e. private investors get bailed out from their bad private debts by a tax paying public to which those debts are transferred).

Same goes for the highest tranche held by some French and German bondholders who should have taken a hair cut long ago if it weren&#039;t for being shielded from their bad bets via the crime wave of fraudulent mortgage foreclosures.

&quot;Foreclosure Fraud: It’s the Tranches, Stupid&quot;
By: Cynthia Kouril Tuesday October 12, 2010 2:34 pm
Link: http://my.firedoglake.com/cindykouril/2010/10/12/foreclosure-fraud-it%E2%80%99s-the-tranches-stupid/

There&#039;s much more on the American side of the international mortgage foreclosure fraud at http://firedoglake.com/foreclosure-fraud.

So, #OccupyDC, #StopTheMach2011 and other #Occupy folks do understand hence why #Occupy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did make a very short response here 2 days ago. Not sure where it went &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8216;Late Night FDL: If You Need “Economic Certainty” Before Investing, You’re Not a Risk Taker&#8217;<br />
By: dakine01 Wednesday September 21, 2011 8:00 pm<br />
Link: <a target="_blank" href="http://firedoglake.com/2011/09/21/late-night-if-you-need-economic-certainty-before-investing-youre-not-a-risk-taker"  rel="nofollow">http://firedoglake.com/2011/09/21/late-night-if-you-need-economic-certainty-before-investing-youre-not-a-risk-taker</a></p>
<p>By definition, business activity involves risk. If it doesn&#8217;t, then it&#8217;s called &#8220;corporate welfare&#8221; or &#8220;privatizing the benefits to a privileged few while socializing the risks&#8221; (i.e. private investors get bailed out from their bad private debts by a tax paying public to which those debts are transferred).</p>
<p>Same goes for the highest tranche held by some French and German bondholders who should have taken a hair cut long ago if it weren&#8217;t for being shielded from their bad bets via the crime wave of fraudulent mortgage foreclosures.</p>
<p>&#8220;Foreclosure Fraud: It’s the Tranches, Stupid&#8221;<br />
By: Cynthia Kouril Tuesday October 12, 2010 2:34 pm<br />
Link: <a target="_blank" href="http://my.firedoglake.com/cindykouril/2010/10/12/foreclosure-fraud-it%E2%80%99s-the-tranches-stupid/"  rel="nofollow">http://my.firedoglake.com/cindykouril/2010/10/12/foreclosure-fraud-it%E2%80%99s-the-tranches-stupid/</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s much more on the American side of the international mortgage foreclosure fraud at <a target="_blank" href="http://firedoglake.com/foreclosure-fraud"  rel="nofollow">http://firedoglake.com/foreclosure-fraud</a>.</p>
<p>So, #OccupyDC, #StopTheMach2011 and other #Occupy folks do understand hence why #Occupy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melty</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>melty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 20:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;What you occupiers keep focusing on is how evil/greedy corporations are.&quot; Says who? Really? Is that really what the entire Occupy movement is about? I think not. Maybe some idiot bandwagoneers out there make it look that way...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What you occupiers keep focusing on is how evil/greedy corporations are.&#8221; Says who? Really? Is that really what the entire Occupy movement is about? I think not. Maybe some idiot bandwagoneers out there make it look that way&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t begrudge anyone from taking a little time off and re-charging.  However, if an organization is struggling, then the leadership of those organizations should be judicious in the amount of time they spend on rest and relaxation.  There&#039;s a time for that activity, but not as much when an organization has significant problems and isn&#039;t performing well.  That goes for CEOs, Non-Profit Executive Directors, AND Government officials.  

It takes about 5 hours to play an average round of golf.  I&#039;m an ordinary Joe who would love to play more golf, but I&#039;m so busy I can&#039;t find the time - I play about 5 times a year - and have a difficult time finding even that much time to play.  Interestingly, Barack Obama has played 41 rounds of golf through the middle of July since he took office.  That&#039;s equal to 205 hours on the golf course, or the equivalent of about 5 full work weeks.  Furthermore, he took 61 vacation days during his first 31 months in office.  So, in other words he&#039;s playing golf or vacationing about 5 weeks a year for his first 2.5 years in office.  He&#039;s also been known to play quite a bit of hoop, and throw some pretty extravagant parties that don&#039;t seem to have much connection to the government&#039;s business.  

How many of you can take that much time off during a good year?  I know I can&#039;t.  When someone is presiding over the largest economy in the world,  which is failing, how can the leader justify taking more than a month a year off?  If our economy was going well and there weren&#039;t significant systemic problems, then I wouldn&#039;t care, but that&#039;s not the state we are in.  There are serious problems that need focus and attention.  Talk about an elitist!  He&#039;s sipping champagne while the country burns.  Yet, the Occupy crowd don&#039;t seem concerned with his extravagant parties, golf outings, vacations, and sending Michelle around the world financed by tax payer money, all the while doling out favors and money to people and companies, and organizations he likes (SEIU, GE, NEA, UAW, GM, Solyndra, etc.).   

What&#039;s even more appalling is the he takes you all for a bunch of dupes.  He is using you as pawns to try to help him win re-election.  Yet, what positive outcomes has he accomplished since he has been in office?  Is unemployment lower?  Is the economy stronger?  Are fewer people living in poverty?  Is there more or less divisiveness?  Are we in fewer wars?  Is the government improving the quality of your life?   Is education less expensive and more effective?  He is now even admitting that parts of the health care bill won&#039;t work.  Occupy, you are on the wrong track.  It isn&#039;t the 1%, Wall Street, or Banks that you should be protesting - rather you should be camped out on The White House front lawn calling for smaller, limited, more accountable government.  The biggest, most undeserving, fat cat in the country occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t begrudge anyone from taking a little time off and re-charging.  However, if an organization is struggling, then the leadership of those organizations should be judicious in the amount of time they spend on rest and relaxation.  There&#8217;s a time for that activity, but not as much when an organization has significant problems and isn&#8217;t performing well.  That goes for CEOs, Non-Profit Executive Directors, AND Government officials.  </p>
<p>It takes about 5 hours to play an average round of golf.  I&#8217;m an ordinary Joe who would love to play more golf, but I&#8217;m so busy I can&#8217;t find the time &#8211; I play about 5 times a year &#8211; and have a difficult time finding even that much time to play.  Interestingly, Barack Obama has played 41 rounds of golf through the middle of July since he took office.  That&#8217;s equal to 205 hours on the golf course, or the equivalent of about 5 full work weeks.  Furthermore, he took 61 vacation days during his first 31 months in office.  So, in other words he&#8217;s playing golf or vacationing about 5 weeks a year for his first 2.5 years in office.  He&#8217;s also been known to play quite a bit of hoop, and throw some pretty extravagant parties that don&#8217;t seem to have much connection to the government&#8217;s business.  </p>
<p>How many of you can take that much time off during a good year?  I know I can&#8217;t.  When someone is presiding over the largest economy in the world,  which is failing, how can the leader justify taking more than a month a year off?  If our economy was going well and there weren&#8217;t significant systemic problems, then I wouldn&#8217;t care, but that&#8217;s not the state we are in.  There are serious problems that need focus and attention.  Talk about an elitist!  He&#8217;s sipping champagne while the country burns.  Yet, the Occupy crowd don&#8217;t seem concerned with his extravagant parties, golf outings, vacations, and sending Michelle around the world financed by tax payer money, all the while doling out favors and money to people and companies, and organizations he likes (SEIU, GE, NEA, UAW, GM, Solyndra, etc.).   </p>
<p>What&#8217;s even more appalling is the he takes you all for a bunch of dupes.  He is using you as pawns to try to help him win re-election.  Yet, what positive outcomes has he accomplished since he has been in office?  Is unemployment lower?  Is the economy stronger?  Are fewer people living in poverty?  Is there more or less divisiveness?  Are we in fewer wars?  Is the government improving the quality of your life?   Is education less expensive and more effective?  He is now even admitting that parts of the health care bill won&#8217;t work.  Occupy, you are on the wrong track.  It isn&#8217;t the 1%, Wall Street, or Banks that you should be protesting &#8211; rather you should be camped out on The White House front lawn calling for smaller, limited, more accountable government.  The biggest, most undeserving, fat cat in the country occupies 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Term limits and voting in only politicians who pledge to reduce the size and scope of government would help solve this problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Term limits and voting in only politicians who pledge to reduce the size and scope of government would help solve this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>https://occupyportland.org/2011/10/19/portland-poverty-awareness-march-fri-oct-21-1130am/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://occupypdx.org/?p=1135#comment-746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly:  what would have been wrong with letting Fannie &amp; Freddie go bankrupt?  Yet, politicians like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barack Obama would NEVER allow that.  Are you aware that Fannie and Freddie are quasi-government entities?  What you occupiers keep focusing on is how evil/greedy corporations are, but the people who are allowing themselves to be influenced by corporations and who are spending record levels of tax payer dollars are the politicians.  Government is screwing up the economy far more than any corporation.  The problem with government is that the bigger it becomes and the more control they have over our lives and commerce the more problems they create whether they are Republican or Democrat.  It&#039;s the nature of big government.  If you want to do something productive camp out at your congress person&#039;s office or on the White House front lawn and insist on limited government:  dramatically cut spending, cut taxes - including for the 1%, cut those regulations that don&#039;t meet a society cost-benefit test, and eliminate entire agencies that have outlived their usefulness (i.e. NASA, federal department of education - the states can handle this, the IRS if we can replace the tax system with something simpler, etc.).  The government should quit picking winners and losers.  By this I mean that we shouldn&#039;t be providing any foreign aid unless there is a national defense purpose, we should not be providing subsidies to any corporations, we should quit funding an organization that is rife with corruption - the UN, the government should get out of the student loan business, and no more loans or grants to companies like Solyndra should be made (leave that to the private sector).

I understand the frustration of a bad economy, but, unfortunately, the policies the government has pursued over the past 3-5 years are making things worse not better.  It&#039;s time for Occupy to turn its protest to where the real blame resides:  the White House and congress.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly:  what would have been wrong with letting Fannie &amp; Freddie go bankrupt?  Yet, politicians like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Barack Obama would NEVER allow that.  Are you aware that Fannie and Freddie are quasi-government entities?  What you occupiers keep focusing on is how evil/greedy corporations are, but the people who are allowing themselves to be influenced by corporations and who are spending record levels of tax payer dollars are the politicians.  Government is screwing up the economy far more than any corporation.  The problem with government is that the bigger it becomes and the more control they have over our lives and commerce the more problems they create whether they are Republican or Democrat.  It&#8217;s the nature of big government.  If you want to do something productive camp out at your congress person&#8217;s office or on the White House front lawn and insist on limited government:  dramatically cut spending, cut taxes &#8211; including for the 1%, cut those regulations that don&#8217;t meet a society cost-benefit test, and eliminate entire agencies that have outlived their usefulness (i.e. NASA, federal department of education &#8211; the states can handle this, the IRS if we can replace the tax system with something simpler, etc.).  The government should quit picking winners and losers.  By this I mean that we shouldn&#8217;t be providing any foreign aid unless there is a national defense purpose, we should not be providing subsidies to any corporations, we should quit funding an organization that is rife with corruption &#8211; the UN, the government should get out of the student loan business, and no more loans or grants to companies like Solyndra should be made (leave that to the private sector).</p>
<p>I understand the frustration of a bad economy, but, unfortunately, the policies the government has pursued over the past 3-5 years are making things worse not better.  It&#8217;s time for Occupy to turn its protest to where the real blame resides:  the White House and congress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
